“The photographer is a joyous sensualist, for the simple reason that the eye traffics in feelings, not in thoughts." ~ Walker Evans

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Seeing Today's Big Apple, Yesterday

While surrounded by legions of photographers touting cameras with 3" LCD screens, Morton Rosenberg's photographic tool of choice is often rejected by a society obsessed with the latest and greatest.

Armed with a Bessa-L Rangefinder, Rosenberg masterfully produces timeless photographs that triumphant even the best of digital imagery, using his paltry technology of yesteryear.

Although Rosenberg's shots are of modern day New York City, viewers will be pleasantly tricked into believing that they have traveled backwards through time. This is achieved by his skillful method of processing the images, bringing about a sense of historic warmth.

Please take the time out to view Morton Rosenberg's gallery of New York City!

Monday, December 24, 2007

Writing with Light (Literally): Mindful Motion Photography

"A photographer, writer and artist," words that Vanessa Van Ryzin, the mastermind behind Mindful Motion Photography, uses to describe herself. Words that are often heralded by every photographer -- young and old, aspiring and professional.

However, there is nothing amateur about Ryzin's photographic creativity.

She has successfully managed to build the perfect segway between photo (light) and graphy (writing); two conjoined terms that are so closely united, but never fully intertwined. I am most impressed with her unique gallery entitled "Visual Poetry," which literally, uses words within her photography.

Beyond the creativity, Ryzin nails a perfect 10 out of 10 with technical details. Her knowledge with depth of field and color are professionally expressed within shots such as this sea shell on the right. Doing so has added three-dimensionality, an element that exacerbates the beauty of her subjects.

Kudos to Mindful Motion Photography for duly occupying an hour's worth of my time!

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Sony A700 Goodness

Unfortunately, I have yet to plop down a grand and a half for the Sony A700.

However, those who are on the fence about purchasing the A700 will enjoy these three links which further praise Sony's Advanced Amateur dSLR.

"Luminous Landscape: Sony A700 Field Report" - written by Douglas Brown, this article spends very little time "pixel-peeping," and instead, more on the camera's real-life usability.

"My experience with the Sony Alpha 700" - this piece focuses on upgrading from the Konica Minolta 7D.

"Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 Review" - Phil Askey & Simon Joinson's review analyzes the camera's technical abilities: from start-up time (in seconds) to noise grain (as compared to the Nikon D300, Canon 40D, and other similar cameras in this class).

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Moving Up: Steven Laxton (Warning - Nudity)

Ladies & Gentlemen, this is the type of stuff you can find in a museum.

PopPhoto.com recently wrote about up & coming photographic artists in an article entitled, "Emerging Artists 2007." My favorite highlight focused on Steven Laxton, who has a portfolio of "abstract body shots." He enlisted the aid of the New York City Ballet to stand under a beautifully lit studio and pose as his models.

Please note that Mr. Laxton's portfolio does contain nudity. However, they are by no means pornographic. Laxton's work actually reminds me of a modern day Discobolos - sculpted by Myron. Laxton's abstract bodies accomplish the same feat; it emphasizes the beauty of the human body - similar to Myron's work during the classical Greek period.

I urge all of you to take a look at Laxton and all of the other photographers featured in PopPhoto's featurette!

Friday, November 09, 2007

A Digital Brawl: Canon 40D vs Sony A700 vs Nikon D300

Three formidable opponents. Three very usable cameras. Who will come out as top dog?

As a Minolta 7D shooter, I have invested thousands of dollars (camera bodies, lenses, misc. equipment, etc.) into their A-mount. Now that they are bought out by Sony, I have to decide whether I should stick with their new offering - the Sony A700 - or sell my stuff and jump to a different camera brand.

One of my biggest pet peeves about the Minolta 7D was the (excuse my language) shitty autofocus speed. Their older film SLR cameras had a faster AF speed - simply inexcusable!

Popular Photography recently ran camera tests on the Canon 40D and Sony A700. I still await their test on the Nikon D300 - which might be *the* camera that dethrones Canon.

In the interim, the two reviewed cameras seem very similar. PopPhoto finds that...
  • Canon and Sony's AF speeds are very similar except in dim-lit situations. Sony's AF starts to stink, thereafter.
  • Canon edges out Sony in the noise department. It seems that Canon's smaller 10mp CMOS sensor (vs. Sony's 12mp) and experience with CMOS technology (and their handle on noise) edges out the Sony in this department.
  • PopPhoto reports that the Canon has better color accuracy than the A700.
  • A700's ergonomics are better than that of Canon's - a subjective debate.
What do I think of all this?
I am, by no means, a "pixel peeper" (meaning I do not magnify and analyze every single detail in a picture).

Frankly, all of the cameras appear to be very usable. Plus, the Canon 40D and Nikon D300 bodies cost a few hundred more - on top of the cost associated with switching systems. Money is still an issue for me and most other non-professional hobbyists.

I foresee my current 7D being demoted to secondary (or even retired) status by either Christmas 2007 or early 2008.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

I didn't even need to say, "smile and say cheese."

Julie is easily one of the best clients that I have worked with. Not only is she camera-friendly, she was more excited about the shoot than I was -- and it takes a lot of excitement to surpass me with doing photo shoots!

I also learned that she loves sunny days. She did not understand why photographing people under the high sun was very difficult. Thankfully, the clouds were out, serving as nature's soft box. I hope this gallery of her photo shoot changes her mind!

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Roger, We Have Liftoff!

James Nguyen Photography >> Galleries

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
New look, new content.

Friday, October 05, 2007

One of the 'Betz': Re-Defining Professional Photography

It's not everyday that a "professional" photographer gets to shoot a "professional" sport - such as a Major League Baseball game. When these "professionals" aren't shooting high-intensity events, they can turn everyday objects (such as pasta - everyone knows my obsession with pasta) into photographic masterpieces.

I was perusing around the Internet and ended up sifting through Ed Betz's website. This man has an AMAZING portfolio. I especially admire his sports shots, such as the one of Todd Zeile of the New York Mets sliding into second base against the Boston Red Sox.

I am only 22 and simply am an amateur, at best. I haven't even updated my own website in half a year and have lost a little bit of my motivation to go out and shoot. I wish I could pinpoint the answer to the question, "why?" Perhaps it's because I am in a transitional phase of my life (graduated college, starting a new job, etc.) but I simply cannot find that "spark" anymore.

However, looking through Ed Betz's collection has re-inspired me to go out and continue building my own collection of images.

It doesn't matter whether a photographer uses the new Nikon D3, the Canon MarkIII, or whatever he/she may choose. One's eye for photography and posession of various skills needed to operate the tools re-iterates my belief that these pro-grade cameras are all very good in their own rights.

We, as photographers, need to remind ourselves that nothing in this world is perfect, including dSLR bodies. Most of the excessive pixel-peeping that I often see with any and every camera brand is, quite frankly, a waste of time as one could be devoting such time to take awesome pictures -- like the ones Ed has.

I encourage you to visit Ed Betz's website at: http://www.edbetz.com

Monday, October 01, 2007

A Compact Camera Buyer's Guide for the Average James

Take every piece of advice with a grain of salt.

Before continuing with my guide on buying a camera, I would like to point out that I used to sell cameras at a big-box electronic retailer for a living. That doesn't mean what I, or the salesman at the store, says is 100% objective. For example: a camera may fit nicely into the palm of my hands, but maybe you have bigger hands than I do.

Although online vendors tend to offer slightly better prices, I would recommend purchasing cameras from a store that you can walk into. Take advantage of their return policy and remember that your own preferences are more important than the words you are about to read.

One last point to keep in mind. This guide is aimed towards the novice and amateur crowd s looking to own a good camera for both fun and artsy pictures. The "Professional" crowd wouldn't be reading this anyways...
"I want to take better pictures. What's a good camera to buy?"

That is one of the most common questions that a former salesman/now photographer, like myself, is posed with. Let's look at all of the deciding factors in buying a camera.

Before going deep into detail, here are some frequently updated buying guides from reputable photography websites. Have no fear - I generally agree with most of their picks.

Imaging Resource's Top Picks
DCResource's Top Picks

None of these guides outline, in detail, what a buyer should look for when hunting for a camera. That is why I am doing just that. If you don't feel like reading, here are my top three picks in a nutshell.
Canon Powershot A850IS Canon Powershot A570IS Olympus SP-550 UltraZoom w/ stabilization

Even though a camera boasts a high megapixel count, it doesn't necessarily mean you will get sharper/clearer pictures. In many situations, the opposite is true.

Think of the time when you were in a small, crowded elevator and thought, for the first time in your life, you were clastrophobic. Without getting technical, manufacturers are doing just that: cramming more pixels into a tiny camera.

The result is a "noisier" picture (click on the Fairfield University mug to the right to see digital noise at ISO 800). Noise exists in every digital picture you see, but are more apparent when you enlarge pictures to poster size (11x14 and up) and especially at higher ISO sensitivity settings. More on ISO sensitivity later!

The plus side to having more megapixels is that you have more flexibility to blow pictures up into larger poster-size. Pictures are less pixelated (in other words, it's less "blocky" and looks clearer) when you have more pixels to work with.

This shot, taken in my own living room without the flash flash, was then downloaded straight out of my camera and was not re-touched. It's extremely grainy (similar to the old-school grain in film photographs) - except this type of grain is ugly.

How important are the megapixels in a camera? Examine your own habits: how often are you *really* going to enlarge pictures? You won't notice a difference in sharpness or noise when you view them at a reduced size on the computer, or on a printed 4x6.

In a nutshell: Megapixels, to me, are a moot point unless you enlarge pictures beyond 8x10. As of October 2007, I am more than content with my 6 megapixel pocket camera.

Battle of the Zooms
This one may seem pretty obvious. The larger the zoom, the closer you get with a picture.

Buyers be weary of the misleading "digital" zoom.

Digital zoom is essentially the camera electronically magnifying a shot. Sounds cool, right? What's the catch?

Digital zooming is the SAME thing as magnifying and cropping a picture on a computer. If you "magnify" the picture within the camera, you lose the un-zoomed part of the image. Whereas if you shot the un-zoomed photograph and later cropped it on a PC, you now have the flexibility of keeping the original OR keeping the cropped version.

Magnified shots are also less sharp and a bit more noisy (as you are essentially enlarging a portion of the image).

Optical zoom is the good one of the two brothers. This is where the camera is physically moving the glass closer to your subject without compromising most of the image quality.

Larger zoom cameras tend to be big. You won't find large optical zoom cameras in a credit card style camera.

A close match: While maintaining awesome picture quality, one of Panasonic's known gems is the Lumix TZ3; a small'ish camera with a large 10x zoom!

"Credit card size" cameras pack less features (such as a lack of Aperture, Shutter, or Manual modes gives you more control over the pictures you take). If you are looking for a party camera, slim ones are created specifically for you.

They tend to have large LCD screens, a thousand different scene modes (e.g. Beach, Snow, etc.) and offer an overall no-frills experience. One example is the Olympus Stylus 750. With 7.1mp, 5x optical zoom, a small exterior, and its not-so-hefty price tag of $250 (as of October 2007), you can't go wrong ... unless you want something more than a "fun" camera.

A reputable review for the Stylus 750 by DCResource.com states that the camera has "softness around edges of frame; fuzzy details." Such image quality issues are common with slim cameras.

Image Quality
Then how does one judge image quality?

Generally speaking, image quality goes hand-in-hand with cameras that allow you to set and/or adjust the following variables:

Aperture Value
Shutter Speed
White Balance
ISO Sensitivity

or best of all...

Manual Mode (where the photographer can adjust all of the aforementioned variables).

To keep it simple: cameras that allow for these adjustable values have a higher image quality as those who know how to manipulate them, will also be able to recognize good image quality vs. bad image quality.

Intimidated? Explaining what each of the variables do is an article on its own!

Luckily, all of the cameras that have the adjustable values still possess an "Auto" mode. The same goes with Scene Modes (such as Beach, Snow, etc.). Auto and Scene Modes simply know when to pick a correct combination of the aforementioned settings - but not all of the time.

A camera is sometimes too unintelligent to choose the right settings. That is why advanced photographers usually want the ability to adjust the White Balance, or the Aperture, etc. depending on the moment.

Image Stabilization
This feature is quite useful when the photographer opts to disable the flash. Under poor lighting conditions and without the aid of flash, pictures are more prone to being blurred. Image Stabilization doesn't work miracles (especially when there is very little light available) but it does help to a certain degree.

Look at this picture of my friend Michelle and her puppy, Rocky, taken under a normal kitchen fluorescent light. If you look closely, it's already a bit blurry. "IS" saved the picture from being completely blurry.

For coffee drinkers like myself, our hands can be pretty shaky. It won't shake as much as for someone who, unfortunately, has arthritis. But the hands of someone amped up on caffeine does shake *just enough* that it can blur a perfectly good picture. In many cases, IS does a good job of compensating for this faux-condition.

Battery Type
Cameras eat battery power like candy.

That's why I love cameras that can take Double AA's. If your camera's battery runs out of juice while you are on the road, you can just stop into any convenience store and buy Double AA batteries!

On an environmentally friendly level, they sell rechargable Double-AA batteries. The 1-Hour charger and 4 batteries cost about $20-$30. One investment in this puppy will prevent you from having to buy AA's every single time your camera runs out of juice.

Non-conventional batteries (the square or rectangle shaped ones) restrict you from doing just that. You'd have to run home and stick your battery into the charger. This poses a few of the following issues:
- What if you lose your charger?
- What if you lose the battery?
- Where do you effortlessly buy extra non-AA batteries?

I'd recommend the Duracell 1-Hour Charger, though they do make 15-minute chargers. If you are the procrastinating type that waits until the last minute, get the 15-minute version.

My Own Top Picks:
As of October 2007, here are my own top picks for small cameras broken down into general categories.

Slim Credit-Card Style "Fun" Camera:
Canon Powershot SD850IS (8mp with 4x optical zoom)

It lacks many of the manual features (such as Aperture or Shutter). But it does a damn good job of staying small and taking good party pictures - especially if you do not know how Aperture, Shutter, White Balance, and ISO values work. It doesn't take AA batteries so you will have to order do a little detective work on where you can buy a genuine or generic spare.

Regular Zoom Compact Camera for Novice/Advanced Users:
Canon Powershot A570IS (7mp with 4x optical zoom)

I have the older A540 and I love it. The A570 is its successor as it maintains the awesome image quality when compared to other non-professional cameras. There are a lot of customizable features (such as Color Vividness), along with the advanced manual settings (Shutter, etc.).
Long Zoom That Is Not-So-Compact for the Advanced User:
Olympus SP-550 (7mp with 18x optical zoom)

From everything that I have read, this camera is amazing! It's definitely not something you can even try to put into your pocket. But you get a huge 18x optical zoom, image stabilization, manual controls, a huge LCD, and it takes double AA batteries!

Monday, July 30, 2007

Home-Made Studio Backdrop

This is really neat. With a cheezy set of tools from Ikea, one can turn an ordinary room into a faux-lighting studio with a backdrop. Credit goes to my former college house-mate, James Burns, for finding this!